Over 58628
politifake

Far Politics


Bernie Sanders 2016 -




Obama's Nefarious Priorities -




WELFARE - Is hated by those who administer it Resented by those who pay for it And degrading to those who receive it


TAGS: welfare
Rating: 4.63/5

More politifakes by TheSanityInspector

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:43 am
Never understood why this isn't mandatory? Do we want junkies to sit on their a** on our dime?


Illegal Parasites -




WELFARE CAT - Can't you guys come up with a website or something? Having to go pick up my check once a month is a pain in the butt


TAGS: welfare bum
Rating: 4.06/5

More politifakes by Lboy

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:44 am
Still made me smile
RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:44 am
Looks like a fake


If Michael Brown, Eric Garner & Trayvon Martin had been killed in Afghanistan -


TAGS: michael brown eric garner trayvon martin obama holder sharpton jesse jackson farrakhan race baiters naacp afghanistan iraq war troops
Rating: 4.97/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Thedge - December 12, 2014, 1:58 pm
Been a couple weeks, probably don't now. Just so the sleep well. 5L


LINCOLN - He knew welfare was a bad idea as well


TAGS: lincoln welfare
Rating: 4.21/5

More politifakes by DLM4

EmilioDumphque - November 12, 2012, 12:19 pm
Welfare is for people who "can't" not "won't". Now explain the more expensive concept of corporate welfare.


THERE SHOULD BE SOME GUIDELINES - We can start with these




WHY WELFARE IS BAD - Jefferson summed it up pretty well


TAGS: jefferson welfare
Rating: 4.38/5

More politifakes by DLM4

Comedian1298 - December 22, 2012, 7:44 pm
well said


SOME THINGS ARE OBVIOUS - A shame we don't get it.


TAGS: welfare food stamps
Rating: 4.78/5

More politifakes by Lboy

Scramblus - September 10, 2013, 5:34 am
Referring to poor people as animals, inspiring.


Stupid Socialist Sanders -




YOUR TAX DOLLARS - Hard at work.




THANKS OBAMA - Now I can be a welfare queen for life




LIBERAL TAX MYTH - 'The rich don't pay their taxes' With the top 10% paying over 70% of all taxes collected, this lie is blatant. It's typical class warfare BS from the Marxist left.




THIS FAR - I Am This Far From Completely Destroying America.




THE FART GAME - It's more fun in public.


TAGS: hillary obama fartgame
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Kewgah

birddseedd - August 31, 2014, 2:46 am
I wonder if hillary is blowing him, bill cant exactly complain


4 THINGS THE DEMOCRATS WON'T TALK ABOUT AT THE DNC - 1.The National Debt 2.The Real Unemployment Rate 3.Gas Prices 4. More than one third of Americans are on Government Assistance.


TAGS: obama democrats economy welfare romney
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by caposwfl

JGalt - September 4, 2012, 9:53 pm
because class warfare and hate speech is just soo much easier when you have no record to stand on!!!!


Obama The Elitist Hypocrite -




MICHELLE OBAMA SAYS - that breast feeding kids longer helps prevent obesity. I guess she has not seen the welfare queens shopping at WalMart (who have been sucking on the public tit called welfare for years)....




HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF - “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.” quote by Karl Marx




WORKING 9 TO 5 -




WASTING AWAY IN OBAMAVILLE - Looking for our lost glimmer of hope..




RED STATES - I'm sick and tired of paying for these freeloaders!




CAN YOU SMELL IT? - Someone loves the smell of his own farts!




THPPPPBBBBBT - "See Nancy. I told you his farts don't stink." *Sniff* *Sniff* AHHHH!




Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -


TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward


THE WELFARE STATE - Formerly known as America.




WELFARE FRAUD - Acceptable if you're a big corporation?


TAGS: corporate welfare
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

StoneTools - June 7, 2013, 8:58 am
her non-existent farm and the solar industry need the money to help pay for their bankruptcies, and the IRS needs its subidies for lavish conferences, and the obamas need subsidies for their multi-million dollar vacations
StoneTools - June 7, 2013, 8:55 am
why concentrate on oil companies when you have agriculture subsidies, energy subsidies, export subsidies, education subsidies, and many others. I understand that a woman living in an apartment overlooking central park in new york needs the money for
Rudedog - February 14, 2013, 10:00 pm
Absolutely correct! The lobbyist influence in Washington has turned a capitalist democracy into a corporatist theocracy.
Renza - February 14, 2013, 8:06 am
Makes sense until you don't think about it.


Michelle Obama Plays Race Card AGAIN: Museums Are Only For White People -




SOCIAL DEMOCRACY - The doctrine whereby You can cease being responsible for yourself By pretending to be responsible for everything else




IF THE PARTIES SWITCHED - So why do Democrats still have their Plantations?




FROM NOBILITY TO NO ABILITY IN FIFTY YEARS -


TAGS: obama kennedy food stamps welfare
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

PapaFox - November 28, 2012, 9:47 pm
No, I voted for Obama because Romney was a buffoon. When the Republican Party has the nads to kick out the teabaggers and find their integrity again, they'll get my vote again.
foxrecon19d - November 28, 2012, 7:35 pm
...snicker... That paranoia is why you voted for Obama.
PapaFox - November 28, 2012, 5:05 pm
That would be your paranoia, not mine.
foxrecon19d - November 28, 2012, 3:22 pm
"Republicans want to throw grandma off a cliff..."Republicans want dirty air and water..."Republicans hate blacks..."Republicans are waging a war against women..." All paranoid conspiracy theories whish you s******ed hook, line and sinker...;)
foxrecon19d - November 28, 2012, 3:17 pm
Neither are any of Obama's campaign promises...
PapaFox - November 28, 2012, 2:47 pm
Paranoid conspiracy theories are not facts.
foxrecon19d - November 28, 2012, 1:44 pm
History Comprehension fail- The original intent of the program was to help get people on their feet. The Democrat party intent is to get as many people on the program to keep them dependent on the Democrat Party for survival.
PapaFox - November 20, 2012, 2:55 pm
History fail. The US Food Stamp Program goes back to the 1930's.


Don't like Entitlements? -




YAY...LET'S ALL GET CHECKS - ..let those 1% guys take care of the other 99% of us...that should work out fine




CREATING THE WELFARE CLASS -




YOU JUST MIGHT BE A LIBERAL - If you automatically believe that someone making more than 100k a year must automatically be ripping somebody off




MSLSD NEWS - Because you have to be on some kind of hallucinogen to watch this distorted crap!




GIVING AWAY THE FARM - because there is not much else left, is there?




IMMUTABLE TRUTH - Somethings wrong with the system when welfare recipients in California can spend welfare debit cards at exotic hotels in Hawaii and 5 star hotel casinos in Vegas. Where do we sign up??




Bernie's New Deal For America -




White Lives Matter -


TAGS: white lives matte blacklivesmatter racism bigotry naacp doj race warfare division
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - September 18, 2015, 1:54 pm
good poster bad math, the 25x is should be 2.5x, and the 200% is more like 100% greater. But it is close to 200% of total.


Bernie Supporters -




THAT LOUD SQUEALING SOUND YOU HEAR - Is the Takers of this society panicking at the prospect of losing a claim on other peoples money in the debt ceiling talks.




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


Democrat Racism -




THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS BEEN BUSY -




Whoopi Goldberg -


TAGS: welfare scam to keep you enslaved in trade for democrat votes
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by OTC

foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:13 pm
"I'm new here, idiot?" LOL. Bye, vicky...
foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:07 pm
There is a difference between being anti-welfare and wanting people to be able to be off welfare. Democrsts equate wanting to get folks off welfare as being anti-welfare. That is how they kept folks enslaved to welfare
foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:02 pm
Welfare is a good program. It a**ists folks to survive until that person is capable to be self reliant. In America, the Democrat party uses welfare to enslave people to government. Three-four generations of blacks being on welfare is not progress.
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:46 am
what i really dont like about welfare is the fact that veterans dont get any. the way the US treats its war veterans is atrocious, they get almost nothing, and yet billions of dollars each year goes to corporate welfare...
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:33 am
how about you get fired in a bad economy and struggle to for a year competing with thousands of people for a handful of jobs while homeless? unemployment is a hole, its virtually impossible to get a job when you're homeless and have to beg on the street.
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:30 am
i guess your view of welfare changes when you've been through a stage in your life where receiving welfare was the difference between being "ready for a job" or "homeless and unemployable"
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:29 am
i dont know what the US system is like, but in australia, welfare takes up 1/3 of the budget, and when i'm done with my degree i'll happily pay a decent chunk of my wage to know that others who were in my position wont be reliant upon charitable donations
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:27 am
as a 2nd year university student who relies in welfare, i have to disagree. it gives enormous freedom in terms of not having to worry about immediate survival (I.E. food, accomodation, etc). my parents pay 3-4x more in taxes than i receive for study.
fauxnews - May 27, 2014, 8:46 pm
LOL
Mooooooooooooooooooo - May 27, 2014, 8:39 pm

bye Vicky
fauxnews - May 27, 2014, 8:07 pm
Vik, I'd ask how old you are but I know you cant count that high. X-D The more you hit on TerrorAustralis, the more he's going to tell you to f*** off.We get it,you're a girl,you're just not his type.Save your breath...You'll need it to blow up your date.
foxrecon19d - May 27, 2014, 4:00 pm
Get off terroraustralis' back. Granted, I do not agree with him that pandering to moderates by not talking about getting folks off welfare and being self dependent...wait, he said that? Never mind. Get off terror's back. He means well
OTC - May 27, 2014, 7:42 am
Being on welfare is a big problem. It restricts your abilities and enslaves you to the bureaucracy
terroraustralis - May 27, 2014, 7:09 am
do yourself a favour, drop the "anti-welfare" bull****, because it drives moderates away. there are much bigger problems to deal with.


BATTLE FOR THE FUTURE OF THE REPUBLIC - Summarized in three words: Taxpayers vs. Taxeaters




Loony Liberals -




MR. PRESIDENT - A reminder from the American people! Entitlements are not supposed to be permanent, nor a means to buy votes! Let's put Americans back to work!




KING SIZE ZERO - What we owe the lazy. Get a job and dig into your own pockets.




FAIL: CLASS WARFARE = HAVES VS. HAVE NOTS - Correction; class warfare = works vs. work nots.




WELFARE NATION - The Democratic agenda is now out in the open.




ANIMAL FARM -




IF........... - you can afford beer, wine, drugs, cigarettes, manicures, and tattoos, you probably don’t need food stamps or welfare.


TAGS: welfare abuse
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by JGalt

KALKAM - October 14, 2012, 8:29 pm
yep...


COMMUNITY AGITATOR - Can also add Unemployment Specialist and Welfare Facilitator to his Resume.




CHE GEUVARA - Burned books, banned music, hated blacks and gays, now he's a role model for the far left.




QUESTION - How do you starve an Obama supporter? Hide his food stamps under his work boots.




LAZY AMERICAN TAX PAYERS -




PLANTATIONS - While the outsides have changed over 200 years, controlling the slaves by keeping them uneducated and completely dependent on the master has not. Also, Republicans are the ones who will free them.




CORPORATE WELFARE -


TAGS: corporate welfare
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

terroraustralis - April 3, 2013, 3:56 am
5L


TEDDY ROOSEVELT - Doing what every Republican dreams at election time. Sort of.


TAGS: teddy roosevelt republican safari election
Rating: 1.5/5

More politifakes by jonyungk

Renza - March 6, 2013, 1:36 pm
They seem to manage to shoot the elephant every other time they speak...


Remember when? -




OBAMA'S NOT THE MESSIAH - 'He's the First President That Sanctioned What the Scriptures Forbid'— L. Farrakhan




CLASS WARFARE - Because nothing says he cares for the jobless like his golfing, fundraising and bouts of attacking Republicans with ideas for getting America on the right track




THE FIRST REPUBLICAN - The man had psychic powers.




THE OBAMINATOR -




NEW WELFARE SYSTEM - It works for taxes, why not campaign funds? Oh, right, those tax dollars are MINE, campaign dollars are THEIRS...right...




Perverse Double Standards -




legal vs. illegal -




FARRAKHAN, WHO ONCE CALLED OBAMA "THE MESSIAH," - Slams Obama Over Gay Marriage




IT PAYS TO BE PART OF THE WELFARE STATE- IT DOES NOT PAY TO HAVE TO BE THE ONE DEFENDING IT -




Income Inequality -




ARRESTED FOR TRYING TO BUY IPADS WITH FOOSTAMPS - About time we did something about welfare cheats- they are stealing from those that really need a helping hand




TRIPLE DIP RECESSION - within 48 hours of O's re-election, dozens of major US corporations announce huge layoffs. Welcome to the new normal




American outsourcing -




IF YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY - GET A JOB OR KEEP YOUR JOB




LIVIN ON A PRAYER - Jon certainly can't go platinum singing about living off of his phat farm subsidies!




BAM THREATENS TO CUT OFF SENIORS OF SS CHECKS ... - ...if he doesn't get his way on the debt ceiling. "Desparate times lead to desprate measures."




Pennies From Heaven -




President Obama doesn't want to create jobs -




independence day -




RESPONSIBILITY -




LIBERAL CODE WORDS, PART IV - "Millionaires and Billionaires" - Farmers, small business owners, and any middle-income American with the audacity to reach for prosperity.




YOU WORK....YOU PAY... - ...so the losers can play




Roosevelt -


TAGS: liberal democrat roosevelt politics welfare
Rating: 4.82/5

More politifakes by blesic

terroraustralis - August 23, 2014, 11:10 pm
democrats: "big government is good! republicans: "big government is bad, but we're gonna make one anyway, because f*** the founding fathers"


CONFESSIONS OF AN H&R BLOCK TAX PREPARER -




ANIMAL FARM -




liberal falsehoods -




welfare state -


TAGS: welfare
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by JGalt



DEMOCRATS NOW POLITICIZING WELFARE -




WARFARE WITH CLASS - Its Obamamath, it just does not add up.




LIBERALS ARE PIGS - In an "Animal Farm" sort of way: They know that all animals are equal, but they are "more equal" than all others




Obama the Social Shepherd -




WINNING IN AFGHANISTAN - Hard to do when the White House is worried that Noisy farts by marines offend the afghan rebels.




Liberal logic -




THE SHAMEFUL FACE OF THE REPUBLICAN WAR AGAINST WOMEN -




BILL MAHER HATES YOU - Odd you both support Obama




U.S. DEBT CEILING - Dear Republicans, $14 trillion is enough, vote down any more raises on the debt ceiling.




YOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK! -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE